Time Chasers (1994) (part 1 of 3)

In Time Chasers, amateur Vermont filmmaker David Giancola writes and directs a zero-budget homage to the Back to the Future trilogy, complete with an unorthodox time machine, jumps back and forth from the ‘50s to the near future, and a few instances of people meeting their past/future selves. It was made on the (really, really) cheap, the special effects are bargain basement, and the acting is (to put it mildly) laughable, but it isn’t nearly as bad as people might tell you. And by “people”, I of course mean MSTies.

This movie gained a reputation for being terrible thanks to an appearance on Mystery Science Theater 3000, but if you watch the actual, unedited movie, you’ll find that Time Chasers is a surprisingly entertaining action film given its miniscule budget, with a few funny lines and an occasionally thoughtful plot.

Nick Miller is a dorky Vermont scientist with a horrifying brown mullet and Jay Leno’s chin. Using nothing more than an ancient PC and a Commodore-64, Nick has singlehandedly created a time machine that he calls “the Time Transport”.

Caption contributed by Albert

Bruce Campbell was really the wrong choice for The John Denver Story.

For reasons never made clear, the Transport has been built into a small propeller-driven plane, and every time Nick travels through time he has to take off and land, as well as pass through a cheap special effect that looks like the feedback loop when you point a camcorder at its own monitor.

Time Chasers (1994) (part 1 of 3)

At the start of the film, Nick returns from a successful flight to the future, which is illustrated by him handing his mechanic friend a JFK half-dollar from the year 2041—though I don’t even think they still make these things now.

Time Chasers (1994) (part 1 of 3)

High on his amazing breakthrough, and fully aware that he is now officially the first human being to travel through time, Nick immediately… goes home to watch TV. And as he heads home, we learn that Nick Miller is a different sort of action hero. He doesn’t own a car, and he prefers to ride a bike. No, not a motorcycle. A bicycle. Which puts him in the same league as rough and tumble action heroes like Jupiter Jones.

Time Chasers (1994) (part 1 of 3)

During a commercial break in a late night movie, Nick sees an ad for a company called “Gen-Corp”, which features CEO J.K. Robertson talking about how his company is always on the lookout for new ideas from inventors.

Caption contributed by Albert

Incredibly, the original Smilin’ Bob actor was much creepier.

The article continues after these advertisements...

The next day, a shirtless Nick gets on the phone and invites a Gen-Corp representative down to the airfield to see the Time Transport in action. But he does it on the pretense of showing off a new type of fuel intake. Then he calls up the local newspaper and invites a reporter to come down to the airfield, but this time he makes up a story about a skydiving grandma. Naturally, both parties eagerly accept the invitation. I guess not a whole lot happens in Vermont.

Down at the airfield, the reporter shows up, and she’s Lisa Henson, a woman with a soccer mom haircut who happens to have been one of Nick’s high school classmates. And then the Gen-Corp rep shows up, a guy named Matthew Paul, who looks a lot like Jon Lovitz in a televangelist’s pink/white suit and a bad hairpiece.

Caption contributed by Albert

“Actually, I’m taking this guy to 1879. Mark Twain wants his look back.”

Nick takes them both up in the plane, where he confesses that he lied to them. He says they never would have believed the truth, which is that he’s actually built a time machine. He points to the Commodore-64 in the cockpit as proof and tells them, “The computer runs through a series of equations in about eight picoseconds! Obviously, I had to speed up the computer’s RAM quite a bit for that!” Come on, that’s just plain ridiculous. 64K ought to be enough for anybody. Even if they are traveling through time.

Nick explains the process by which his plane is able to travel into the future, and he even says that to return to the past, all he has to do is “reverse the polarity”. Because if there’s anything that Star Trek has taught the world, it’s that you can do pretty much anything by reversing the polarity. Later, I plan to reverse the polarity on my DVD player and turn this into a professional looking movie.

Lisa and Matthew think he’s nuts at first, but Nick proves his story by flying them through the video feedback loop into the year 2041. Strangely, it’s Lisa who suggests flying to 2041, even though she couldn’t possibly know that’s where Nick just came back from.

Time Chasers (1994) (part 1 of 3)

Amazingly, 2041 will look remarkably similar to 1991. But there are subtle hints that the future is much more environment-friendly: Everyone rides bikes instead of driving, and Matthew sees a placard on a building claiming it’s made of “recycled material”.

Caption contributed by Albert

Just like the script!

Oh yeah, and some kid is holding a small device to his ear, meaning Time Chasers accurately predicted the invention of cell phones! Except for the part where cell phones were actually invented in the 1970s. Still, when it comes to predicting devices that already exist, this movie comes astonishingly close.

Caption contributed by Albert

Sweet! Just 30 more years until my closet full of lime green spandex pants comes back in style!

Also, in some random place, a holographic preacher talks to a random woman, who seems rather bored by his sermon. And in the MST3k episode, Mike and the Bots quipped that the woman looks like Lisa Kudrow, and many fans, not realizing they were making what is commonly known as a “joke”, actually believed that Lisa Kudrow was in Time Chasers. For the record, this is not Lisa Kudrow.

Caption contributed by Albert

Not that appearing in a movie like this is beneath Lisa Kudrow or anything.

Cut to the gang from 1991 taking in the wonders of the mid-21st Century… by having coffee at a mall food court. Of the future! And then the Back to the Future homage kicks off in earnest when Nick attempts to explain the science behind his time machine. But instead of anecdotes about falling off a toilet seat and thinking up the Flux Capacitor, Nick delivers an incredibly awkward analogy where the universe is his cup of coffee, and he and Lisa are the spoons. Well, eventually they’ll be spooning with each other, if that counts.

The gist is that what we perceive as “time passing” is really “Everything affecting everything all the time!” You see, the universe is like a big coffee cup, with “a trillion spoons” in it. When all you need is a knife.

Caption contributed by Albert

I got nothing here. Mainly because it’s 2010 and I think we should all be well past making Matrix jokes by now.

Matthew, being your standard-flavor corporate weasel type, already sees the obvious financial applications of time travel, such as putting money in the bank a hundred years ago and collecting the interest in the present. But Nick wants no part of that sort of distasteful material gain, oh no. He only wants an “R&D grant” to “continue my work”, but given that he’s already able to bring three people into the future and return them unharmed, I’m not sure what further research needs to be done here. I would say he’s well past the proof of concept phase.

Lisa wonders how he envisions Gen-Corp using this technology, so Nick suggests studying the long term effects that humans are having on the environment. Then he adds with a completely straight face, “Or… maybe we could figure out a way to stop shooting at each other!” Or… maybe we could use the Time Transport to turn bombs and guns into kittens and rainbows! Seriously, what was the director smoking when he came up with that line?

Multi-Part Article: Time Chasers (1994)

You may also like...

  • FWIW, I think he managed to get the skydiving Grandma on short notice since it’s the crazy neighbor woman from the grocery store, who seemed to be still way over-interested in him from his childhood.

  • David Russell Hamrick

    There should be a formula to even out the ratings for movies like this. Something like: entertainment value / (available budget + available talent). If you rate it by this formula, Time Chasers comes out at least equal to plodding CGI-fests like Independence Day. And for one glorious moment, when future Nick & Lisa are shot down by future J.K., diverting past Lisa from meeting past Nick and making future Nick too late to stop himself in the past, it felt like a Connie Willis story where the physics of the timeline, or fate, or something, is going to keep them from altering the past. Even if it doesn’t quite pan out that way, still a more entertaining story than the average explosion-fest.

  • Greenhornet

    I’ve only seen the MST3K version, but two things bothered me a lot:
    First, when they fly into the future, they DON’T look at the amazing city, instead they look at the crappy computer screen version of it.
    Second, how does the hero KNOW that it was the EEEVIL! corporation that screwed up the future? Why couldn’t it have been HIS OWN trips that did it? Yes, I know “because they said so”, but how do they REALLY know? Besides “It’s In The Script”, I mean.

    • Greenhornet

      OK, somebody is going to give me some lip about my post, so here’s my defense:

      “Nick realizes that the future only changed after he showed the Transport to J.K. Robertson.”

      No, the future changed after they had a date in the fifties and screwed! I maintain that the bad future is Nick’s fault. In fact, it’s his fault because he invented the thing that was used to screw up the future.

      • KHarn

        Another thing; we never saw Robertson’s other trips to the future. He said that it’s OK, but since he’s “the villain” we ASSUME that he likes a dystopia. For all we know what Robertson saw was the 1930’s “art deco” style future, or the 1950’s “space-oriented” future. As I pointed out above, the future went to hell after the hero and heroine went on their time-travel date and then had sex. It could be THEIR fault and they just WANT it to “the villain’s” fault.