The Motion Picture Association Of America Wants To Stop You From Seeing Eva Green’s Boobs

The Motion Picture Association Of America Wants To Stop You From Seeing Eva Green's Boobs

You know that we are fans of Eva Green’s boobs, even if they can’t always save a movie. That said, there’s no downside to Eva Green’s boobs in your movie or movie poster. Not so fast, says the MPAA, which is banning the Eva Green poster for Frank Miller’s upcoming Sin City sequel, probably because they hate freedom. And boobs.

Perhaps you didn’t know or care that Sin City even HAD a sequel or that it is called A Dame to Kill For or that it is coming out in August, but we know you care about Eva Green’s boobs, so you should join us in our outrage about how the MPAA is run by a bunch of puritans.

Eva Green is just too sexy for the poster of her upcoming sequel to “Sin City,” or so the MPAA believes. […]

We’re told the poster was disapproved by the MPAA “for nudity — curve of under breast and dark nipple/areola circle visible through sheer gown.”

You can see that we’ve helpfully provided a copy of the poster above so that you can determine whether you see Eva Green’s nipple, because we’re nice like that.

What’s that? You say you actually care about the movie? No you don’t. OK, if you insist on pretending that you do, you can watch the trailer.

There. Happy now?

Cinema Blend points out that this ban is some bullshit, especially because things like weapons and SEVERED BODY PARTS are totes cool with the MPAA.

[T]he fact that Eva Green is holding a gun had no bearing on the MPAA’s decision to label the Sin City: A Dame to Kill For poster inappropriate or possibly offensive to sensitive viewers. We can’t show kids or impressionable people the female body. But weapons, blood, or severed body parts are totally fine. Right, Saw 2?

No fucking way are we going to look at that Saw 2 poster again. We’re just going to go back to thinking about Eva Green’s boobs, like god intended.

[Cinema Blend/New York Post]

You may also like...

  • jjdaddyo


  • $160578

    Why do these prudes still have power to comstock film producers?

  • Haribo Lector

    If we don’t send kids the right messages, they might grow up to make sweet, sweet love to each other instead of shooting each other. Is that what you want, Lisa? Because if posters like this aren’t banned, that’s what’s going to happen.

  • saysomething

    As a parent of a young child, I don’t like this poster and I don’t like the gruesome ones either. They are ridiculously hard to explain at an age appropriate level and she definitely sees them. All of them. The bus stop ones are at her eye level from her car seat in the back. I honestly have no good ideas on how to balance free speech and the fact that I just don’t want a lot of stuff right in front of my 6-year-old’s face that should not be right in front of her face. I don’t shelter her, but she can’t handle the truth about the tooth fairy right now, let alone the details of sex or twisted horror films. To the other point of this post, I would always rather have her see a boob than blood and guns and I REALLY don’t understand why censors are more concerned with nudity over violence. Kids see body parts all the time. Turns out they have some body parts of their own.

    • emberglance

      Yeah, I used to have a real problem with the Dexter posters all over town. My girls were under 10 back then and they’d look out the car window at these enormous pictures of a man drenched in blood or standing in front of a blood-spattered background, with the words “The Avenging Angel Returns” or he’s holding a mug that says “Have A Killer Day.” I used to wonder what they made of them. And it’s hard to complain about these things without sounding like a prude but these images are being stuck in front of kids all the time. Is that OK? Dunno.. Too late now for my girls, I guess…And also, yeah, I have no problem with some dramatically veiled boob outlines. Nice work Happynicetimepeople in covering this important story!

    • peteywheats

      The most offensive part of this pic is the gun.

    • Haribo Lector

      The funny thing is, being right in front of small children’s faces is actually what breasts are for, so there’s a pretty big hole in your logic. Even if discovering that there’s no tooth fairy would upset her, I’m sure that the news that human females have breasts wouldn’t rattle her that much.

  • Señor Skwerl

    I’ll have seconds!

  • FlownOver

    ‘Scuse me. I’ll be right back.

  • HabsFan29

    Now THIS should be posted in sideboob.I have spent a good 10-15 minutes looking for this allegedly visible “dark nipple/areola circle”, and I don’t see it. Obviously more looking is required.

    • M H

      “dark nipple/areola circle” in all caps should be their marketing campaign.

    • James Donnaught

      I want to see the version that the MPAA was looking at. Just to be sure.

    • Zyxomma

      One can see the outline of a nipple, but NO areola. I enlarged it several times, and it’s quite invisible.

    • Haribo Lector

      You have to REALLY want to see it. And I do.

  • Zippy W Pinhead
  • daveguy1

    Eva Green has maybe the best boobs in movies today. For even better – that is to say, absolute – proof, see the Bernardo Bertolucci film “The Dreamers”…

  • seancf

    Frank Cross: I want to see her nipples. Censor Lady: But this is a CHRISTMAS show. Frank Cross: Well, I’m sure Charles Dickens would have wanted to see her nipples. Carpenter: You can barely see them nipples. Frank Cross: See? And these guys are REALLY looking.

  • ryp

    The source for this film dates back to the early 90s, when Frank Miller and Robert Rodriguez both seemed to have far more talent than they do now. I’d rather watch Eva Green’s boobs read a telephone book.

  • peteywheats

    Now this is Sideboob! I’m so confused by what HNTP think it is.

    • Zippy W Pinhead

      welcome to the club. Sideboob =/= modest display of cleavage. HNTPG-13 at best

  • Deleted

    This post was deleted.

  • Read that as “green boobs” and I had STAR TREK flashbacks.

  • Jelperman

    There are always two very good reasons to watch an Eva Green movie: