Iron Man 3 (2013)

WARNING: This review is loaded with spoilers. If you haven’t seen Iron Man 3 yet, do not read this. Seriously, you don’t wanna read this. I had the movie spoiled for me, and it suuuucked. Don’t be like me. Stop reading this and get to the theater before some other asshole ruins it for you. Now. Go. Immediately.

So by now, most of you probably have had a chance to see Iron Man 3. Which is good, because I don’t want to just beat around the bush for four paragraphs and end up saying little more than “it’s really good, but I can’t be too specific on why”. For me, reviews aren’t about recommending or not recommending a film. They’re for film discussion, for contextualizing, and hearing different viewpoints on a movie you’ve just seen. So with that in mind, let’s talk about what we all saw this weekend (unless you’re in Europe or Asia, in which case you saw it weeks ago, so lucky you).

One of the things I love about Marvel studio’s films is the fact that they somehow manage to deliver superhero films that are groundbreaking in their faithfulness to their source material in look and tone, while still allowing their directors the creative freedom to make the films their own. The Avengers is unmistakably a Joss Whedon film. Captain America is unmistakably a Joe Johnston film. Thor is unmistakably… half a Kenneth Branagh film. And in that fine tradition of creative tightrope walking, Iron Man 3 is unmistakably a Shane Black film. Christmas setting, neo-noir elements, snappy banter, black comedy, he’s completely in his element, and it’s glorious to behold.

Iron Man 3 has already proved rather polarizing, and for good reason: It lied to you. Brazenly so. I’m a little surprised no one’s tried suing for false advertising yet. I’ve certainly heard dumber reasons to sue a movie. But that is one of the film’s greatest strengths. Iron Man 3 has given us a rare of example of using the advertising campaign to deliberately set up false expectations, making this film’s impact stronger as a result. The film advertised was essentially Iron Man’s The Dark Knight, a brooding, gritty tale of a hero being brought low by a mysterious, chaotic villain. What we got was very different. Certainly our hero was indeed brought low only to rise from the ashes reborn. But the tone was far from oppressively dark, and our grand villain, a long awaited fan favorite character finally brought to the big screen, was not the Joker-esque mastermind we were promised. He was, in fact, a fraud, a fake, a red herring to distract us from the real enemy.

Naturally, this has many Iron Man fans upset. We’ve become used to Marvel Studios bringing us astoundingly accurate translations of comic book characters and stories, far more so than most other studios dare. So such a major deviation from the source material now seems a bit out of left field. But this was absolutely the right move, and to explain why, we need to examine the roots of the character in question: the Mandarin.

Iron Man 3 (2013)

It was commonly understood that the Mandarin was always going to be a little difficult to adapt, for the very simple reason that the idea of the character was hopelessly archaic. The Mandarin was a product of the communist paranoia that so plagued our culture during the Cold War, a Fu Manchu meant to represent the threat of Communist China. Obviously, the Cold War is long over, and the Yellow Peril stereotype is no longer considered acceptable, and rightly so, not just for the business reasons of economic reliance on China, but because it’s, you know… incredibly racist. Nonetheless, the Mandarin is Iron Man’s most well known and enduring nemesis, so it was inevitable that he would have to turn up at some point. But how to go about it?

I imagine Shane Black and his writing team approached the problem like this: What was the Mandarin? Or rather, what was the Cold War-era communist villain archetype he represented? A bogeyman. A face to hate. A contextualization of fears too big to process. Fear of the unknown, of the uncontrollable. Back when the Mandarin was first created, our bogeyman was communists. Who’s our bogeyman today?

Iron Man 3 (2013)

…Yeah. So much did one man terrify the world with his one great atrocity, that ever since, we react with hostility to anything that even reminds us of him. In the ‘50s, you could be labeled a security risk by the government if they even suspected you of being communist. Now you can be labeled a security risk for being Muslim or of Middle Eastern decent. We protest the building of mosques. We get nervous aboard airlines if one of our fellow passengers happens to be wearing a turban.

So we’ve established who our bogeymen are, and were. And there’s one important thing about bogeymen: They aren’t real. Not that there’s no threat, simply that the great terror we’ve built up in our minds is the product of irrational fears, an entity unto itself wholly separate from anything in the real world. Human beings are a panicky, reactionary lot. When something scares us, we need to put a face to it. We need to simplify it in our minds, whether the actual situation is simple or not. We don’t like the idea of a enemy we can’t recognize, so we find it simpler to assume everyone who fits a simple set of criteria is the enemy.

And that’s the genius of Shane Black’s Mandarin. He took this bogeyman, this product of paranoia, and showed it for what it was. He updated the image, made it resemble a more recognizable present fear. Then he took the mask off and showed us that what we were afraid of all this time doesn’t really exist. “We create our own demons,” as the film reminds us.

I know this is small comfort to many of you. You were hoping to see a beloved character you’ve been following for decades brought to the big screen, and instead you got a lecture. Believe me, I know. The Mandarin was one of the first super villains I was exposed to, back when I used to watch Iron Man on The Marvel Action Hour when I was a kid. So I feel your pain. But understand that what you want would never have worked. Like it or not, the Mandarin is hopelessly dated, and represents some very wrongheaded ideas. It would not have been the responsible thing to do as a filmmaker to make a movie about Iron Man battling a Bin Laden-eque super villain. This is what we needed to hear. This is the Mandarin we needed to see: A mask concealing the true villain.

Of course, Ben Kingsley definitely helps sooth the fanboy rage with his magnificent performance. It’s impossible to be mad at the reveal, with this lovably pathetic drunken fool being so entertaining to watch. And it contrasts so well with the true “Mandarin” Aldrich Killian, and I love the sinister swagger Guy Pearce plays him with. The cast overall is a major strength of the film. Robert Downey Jr. feels right at home teaming back up with Black after Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Gwenyth Paltrow as Pepper Potts finally comes into her own as a character, and James Badge Dale is a fun, sleazeball of a secondary villain.

There were a few things that didn’t quite work for me. Rebecca Hall’s character felt underwritten, almost like a half-done character who they never got around to finishing, and Black’s usual penchant for chaotic, tangential plot threads doesn’t always quite work out in the end. But nitpicks aside, this is easily the best Iron Man movie, and one of the best Marvel has ever produced. Clever, unpredictable, bold as hell, and did I mention the score? It’s got a really good score.

Tag: Marvel Cinematic Universe

You may also like...

  • David Rose

    I loved Iron Man 3. I loved their take on The Mandarin. And I loved this analysis. Haters gonna hate, but this perfectly sums up why the movie did it so well.

  • Thomas Stockel

    I thought the film was much better than the second, not as good as the first. I didn’t mind the twist at all and I though it was pretty clever. Maybe it’s my unabashed love of the MK I armor that puts the first film above this one.

    But call me a fanboy, but I would have wanted to see a little more Iron Man in my Iron Man movie.

    • Mark Brown

      To me, I think the whole point that this film was about Tony Stark learning that he was Iron Man even without the armour. After the events of the Avengers where he was teamed with a god, a super-soldier, a um… hulk, and some pretty exceptional human beings, Tony had to be asking himself what he was without his technology. Iron Man 3 answered that question.

      So, as we IT people say: This wasn’t a bug, it was a feature! :-P

      • Thomas Stockel

        Then what was their excuse for their being so little Iron Man in Iron Man 2? :)

        • Mark Brown

          Oh, in that case it just wasn’t a particularly good film, just more of an extended advertisement for The Avengers… ;-)

          • Thomas Stockel

            Ah, makes sense. :)

  • I loved the shit out of Iron Man 3. Everything I wanted out of a Shane Black-Helmed Iron Man. =)

  • Muthsarah

    I was a lil’ burned by the twist, but it didn’t anger me or anything; it helped that I knew there was a big twist in the middle, and though I didn’t know exactly what it was (false villains or false friends are usually the best guess), it still softened the impact. I wanted Kingsley v Downey, mano a Iron mano, mind games, a duel between two very charismatic, witty, fantastic actors, with minimal distractions. But I understand sequels always “have to be” bigger and twistier, and even though this was my first one of these movies, even I knew The Mandarin couldn’t be played straight, so I wasn’t exactly super invested in a faithful portrayal. It all worked out OK, but I can’t say I was blown away. Maybe a little better than Captain America and Thor, but, meh.

    That said, you make a convincing case here, one that I find intriguing despite my relative apathy. I like what you said about reviews being for “film discussion, for contextualizing, and hearing different viewpoints”; I think at this point, I tend to prefer these types of analytical reviews to watching movies themselves. Including in this case.

  • The_Stig

    I hope in 4 they address Pepper now being a super soldier that can melt metal.

    • Mark Brown

      At the end we’re told that Tony has “cured” Pepper. Does this mean he’s completely reversed the effects of Extremis, or has he only fixed the instability problems so she won’t explode?

      Could be interesting if Pepper is now a superhero in her own rights.

      • The_Stig

        In the comics she kind of is. You know the scene where the suit attaches to her? I took that as a tease for Rescue.

  • MephLord

    One thing missing from an otherwise good treatise on Iron Man 3 is…why does no one ever talk about AIM in this movie? AIM is an iconic staple in Marvel and has been for a very long time. I was hoping that there would be some easter eggs like mentioning the MODOK project or even having the Controller make an appearance. The way AIM was presented wasn’t terrible or bad, but for fans of AIM it kind of left me wanting to see more about AIM and some of the crazy technology that they are capable of.

    Also, Extremis is a pretty new thing in Marvel lore. I thought it was an interesting concept when it appeared in Iron Man: Armored Adventures that made Teen Tony crazy powerful. If Teen Titans is an underrated gem of a cartoon for DC, IM: AA is it’s Marvel counterpart. There are people that absolutely hate it, but I for one enjoy it. The mechanical designs are phenomenal, stories are interesting (the fact that they introduced Iron Man 2099 in an episode still blows me away) and we got to see Pepper Potts become pretty damn awesome later on as the show progressed.

    As for the Mandarin, I’m actually glad that it was a “smoke and mirrors” effect, so when the real Mandarin is introduced with the Makluan Rings it will actually make more sense. Although for Marvel to do so would mean they’d have to find way to bring MODOK into the franchise as well and that might be a tough prospect to bring to fruition.

  • DavidWilmotLow

    just have the killian character be played by an asian actor. you couldnt call him killian of course, but everything else could be left exactly the same. maybe even have him drop a line about wanting to follow in the footsteps of his Mandarin ancestors. There, problem solved. He’s not a yellow peril stereotype, and you’ve actually provided something resembling the character without angering youre fan base.

    • The_Stig

      I get why they did what they did with Mandarin, but all they had to do was play him exactly how they did in the movie, only he’s a sorcerer. I hope in the 4th movie they bring him back and he comes across the 10 rings and they scramble his brain so bad that he becomes The Mandarin for real. I want to see that guy fight Iron Man. If it’s public knowledge that aliens exist I see no reason at all why magic can’t in this universe either.

      • Cristiona

        Because aliens are technology and magic is… well… magic. They’ve rooted everything so far in technology, even the Rainbow Bridge. A hard shift to pure magic wouldn’t fit with the world they’ve been creating.

        Which is another reason I’m worried about Dr. Strange.

  • edharris1178

    Finally saw it this afternoon, the twist with The Mandarin was pretty cool, I think. I’ve never had an issue with changing up a character so he or she fits the era in which they appear. As long as it works (which it does in this case), it’s all good. Good review, Josh.

  • DavidWilmotLow

    and seriously if they want to give us an alternate take on mandarin in Guy Pierce, they should make him something other than a complete rip off of jim carrey in batman forever.